From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinson v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03346-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03346-BNB

01-10-2012

JEREMY PINSON, Applicant, v. BLAKE DAVIS, Respondent.


ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE

Applicant, Jeremy Pinson, is a prisoner in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons, who currently is incarcerated at the ADX in Florence, Colorado. Mr. Pinson initiated this action by filing an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Action. Mr. Pinson has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application in this case and pursuant to Keck v. Hartley, 550 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has determined that a limited Preliminary Response is appropriate. Respondent is directed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts to file a Preliminary Response limited to addressing the affirmative defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies. If Respondent does not intend to raise this affirmative defense, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response. Respondent may not file a dispositive motion as a Preliminary

Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in response to this Order.

In support of the Preliminary Response, Respondent should attach as exhibits all relevant portions of the administrative record, including but not limited to copies of all documents demonstrating whether Applicant has exhausted administrative remedies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this Order

Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response.

DATED January 10, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Pinson v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03346-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Pinson v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY PINSON, Applicant, v. BLAKE DAVIS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03346-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)