From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinson v. Berkebile

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 31, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02802-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02802-BNB

01-31-2013

JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BERKEBILE, PATRICIA RANGEL, OFFICER ANDERSON, OFFICER BOYER, RUSS KRIST, OFFICER KILMER, OFFICER SUTTON, OFFICER McAVOY, LIEUTENANT SHORTIS, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Jeremy Pinson's Motion to Vacate Order, ECF No. 19, filed on January 25, 2013. Mr. Pinson asks the Court to vacate the January 17, 2013 Order because he has submitted a new certified account statement and Messrs. Bacote and Villatoro have opted to withdraw from this action. Only Mr. Pinson has signed the Motion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate Order, ECF No. 19, is denied because Messrs. Bacote and Villatoro, who signed the Supplement to Complaint and indicated their desire to proceed with this action, have not signed the Motion.

DATED January 31, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Pinson v. Berkebile

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 31, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02802-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Pinson v. Berkebile

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BERKEBILE, PATRICIA RANGEL, OFFICER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02802-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2013)