From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinsky v. Warden of the Gilmer Fed. Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Feb 2, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-66 (BAILEY) (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-66 (BAILEY)

02-02-2012

ROBERT PINSKY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF THE GILMER FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David J. Joel. By Local Rule, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Joel for submission of a proposed report and a recommendation ("R&R"). Magistrate Judge Joel filed his R&R on January 6, 2012 [Doc. 7]. In that filing, the magistrate judge recommended that this Court dismiss petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1] as moot [Doc. 7 at 3].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Here, objections to Magistrate Judge Joel's R&R were due within fourteen (14) days of receipt, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The docket reflects that service was accepted on January 9, 2012 [Doc. 8]. To date, no objections have been filed.

Upon careful review of the report and recommendation, it is the opinion of this Court that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 7] should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report. As such, this Court hereby DISMISSES as moot the petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. 1]. Therefore, this matter is hereby ORDERED STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is directed to enter a separate judgment in favor of the respondent.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se petitioner

___________

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pinsky v. Warden of the Gilmer Fed. Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Feb 2, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-66 (BAILEY) (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Pinsky v. Warden of the Gilmer Fed. Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PINSKY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF THE GILMER FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS

Date published: Feb 2, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-CV-66 (BAILEY) (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 2, 2012)