From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinola v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
No. 2: 11-CV-1165 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-CV-1165 KJM KJN P

09-01-2011

RATAJA PINOLA, Plaintiff, v. TIM v. VIRGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Defendants have requested a thirty day extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Good cause appearing, this request is granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 17) is granted;

2. Defendants are granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a responsive pleading.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Pinola v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
No. 2: 11-CV-1165 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Pinola v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:RATAJA PINOLA, Plaintiff, v. TIM v. VIRGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 11-CV-1165 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)