Pinola v. Adams

Full title: RATAJA PINOLA, Plaintiff, v. DARREL G. ADAMS, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 29, 2008

No: 1:08-CV-01013 AWI DLB PC, (Doc. 6) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2008)

Opinion

RATAJA PINOLA, Plaintiff, v. DARREL G. ADAMS, Defendant. No: 1:08-CV-01013 AWI DLB PC, (Doc. 6) United States District Court, E.D. California. October 29, 2008

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

          ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Rataja Pinola ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

         On September 17, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed September 17, 2008, is adopted in full;

         2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff's failure to obey a court order; and

         3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this file.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.