From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 12, 2000
31 S.W.3d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77099

FILED: September 12, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 30, 2000 Application for Transfer Denied December 5, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE SHERRIE B. SULLIVAN.

Mary S. Choi, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Adriane D. Crouse, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper, III, J.


ORDER


Derelle Pinner ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pinner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 12, 2000
31 S.W.3d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Pinner v. State

Case Details

Full title:DERELLE PINNER, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 12, 2000

Citations

31 S.W.3d 123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)