Opinion
NO. 12-12-00074-CV
2013-09-18
PINNACLE HEALTH FACILITIES OF TEXAS VII LP D/B/A ELKHART OAKS CARE CENTER, APPELLANT v. JERRY WATTS AS NEXT FRIEND FOR DELORES WATTS AND GARY BUTLER ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF GLADYS BUTLER, APPELLEE
APPEAL FROM THE 87TH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
The parties to this appeal have filed an agreed motion to set aside the judgment of the trial court pursuant to their settlement agreement. The motion is signed by counsel for all parties. As grounds for the requested relief, the parties cite Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). This rule authorizes an appellate court, in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, to set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).
The parties have complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(2)(B). Accordingly, we grant the parties' motion, vacate the trial court's January 17, 2012 judgment, without reference to the merits, and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the settlement agreement of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(PUBLISH)
JUDGMENT
NO. 12-12-00074-CV
PINNACLE HEALTH FACILITIES OF TEXAS VII LP D/B/A ELKHART OAKS CARE
CENTER,
Appellant
V.
JERRY WATTS AS NEXT FRIEND FOR DELORES WATTS AND GARY BUTLER ON
BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF GLADYS BUTLER,
Appellee
Appeal from the 87th District Court
of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 87-11224)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the agreed motion to set aside the judgment of the trial court pursuant to their settlement agreement, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this court that the agreed motion should be granted, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that the trial court's January 17, 2012 judgment be vacated without reference to the merits, and this case be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the settlement agreement of the parties; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.