From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinnacle Armor, Inc. v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2012
Case No.: 1:07-cv-1655 (LJO) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:07-cv-1655 (LJO)

11-28-2012

PINNACLE ARMOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

STUART F. DELERY Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General VINCENT M. GARVEY Deputy Director TAMRA T. MOORE Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division Federal Programs Branch BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Eastern District of California JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse Attorneys for Defendant United States


STUART F. DELERY
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
VINCENT M. GARVEY
Deputy Director
TAMRA T. MOORE
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division
Federal Programs Branch
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
Eastern District of California
JEFFREY J. LODGE
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
Attorneys for Defendant United States

STIPULATION REGARDING

DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

Plaintiff, Pinnacle Armor, Inc., and defendant, the National Institute of Justice ("NIJ"), stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 6-144(a) and subject to this Court's approval, that:

1. NIJ has until December 21, 2012, to respond to plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record;
2. Plaintiff has until January 4, 2013, to file its reply in support of its Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record; and
3. The hearing on plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record shall take place on January 11, 2013.

Counsel for NIJ seeks this enlargement of time to accommodate briefing schedules in other cases for which she has primary responsibility.

_______________

ERIC H. SAIKI

Counsel for Plaintiff

_______________

TAMRA T. MOORE

Counsel for Defendant

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation of all parties to this action, the Court directs that: Defendant's response to plaintiffs' Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record be filed on or before December 21, 2012; Plaintiff's reply in support of its Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record be filed on or before January 4, 2013; and the hearing on plaintiff's motion will take place at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 4 on January 11, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pinnacle Armor, Inc. v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2012
Case No.: 1:07-cv-1655 (LJO) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Pinnacle Armor, Inc. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PINNACLE ARMOR, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:07-cv-1655 (LJO) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2012)