From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkney v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 7, 2011
Case No. SC10-1556 (Fla. Jan. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. SC10-1556.

January 7, 2011.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D10-2359, 03-CF-3136.


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to reinstatement of the appeal in Case No. 2D102359, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).

Petitioner's Motion to "Supplement the Recorder and/or Order For Respondent to Supplement the Record" is granted. Any other motions or requests for relief are hereby denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pinkney v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 7, 2011
Case No. SC10-1556 (Fla. Jan. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Pinkney v. State

Case Details

Full title:EMERSON PINKNEY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. SC10-1556 (Fla. Jan. 7, 2011)