From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkham v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 19, 2017
Case No. CV 16-01088-AG (DTB) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-01088-AG (DTB)

05-19-2017

BRADFORD A. PINKHAM, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered granting the Motion to Dismiss and dismissing this action without prejudice. Dated: May 19, 2017

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pinkham v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 19, 2017
Case No. CV 16-01088-AG (DTB) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Pinkham v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:BRADFORD A. PINKHAM, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 19, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-01088-AG (DTB) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2017)