From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinkard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 9, 2021
327 So. 3d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1350

11-09-2021

David Harold PINKARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Clifton Wilson, Public Defender, and Elizabeth A. Rosado, Assistant Public Defender, Live Oak, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jovona I. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Clifton Wilson, Public Defender, and Elizabeth A. Rosado, Assistant Public Defender, Live Oak, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jovona I. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition for writ of habeas corpus on the merits. See Mehaffie v. Rutherford , 143 So. 3d 432, 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Rowe, C.J., and Makar and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pinkard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 9, 2021
327 So. 3d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Pinkard v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Harold PINKARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

327 So. 3d 971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)