Eden , 344 Ga. App. at 866 (1), 812 S.E.2d 317. See Pineres v. George , 284 Ga. 483, 483 (1), 668 S.E.2d 727 (2008) ; Gallit v. Buckley , 240 Ga. 621, 626 (3), 242 S.E.2d 89 (1978) ; Harvey v. Lindsey , 251 Ga. App. 387, 390 (1), 554 S.E.2d 523 (2001). Here, as previously noted, Valley's original complaint alleged that the South Atlantic Conference promised Valley verbally and in writing that his over 24 years of prior service in the Seventh-day Adventist Church would be honored and credited toward the Regional Retirement Plan if he relinquished his right to receive any benefits in the NAD Retirement Plan and joined the Regional Retirement Plan; that based on that promise, Valley waived his right to receive his vested retirement benefits from the NAD Retirement Plan and joined the Regional Retirement Plan; and that, despite that promise and Valley's relinquishment of his other retirement benefits based on that promise, the South Atlantic Conference later informed Valley that it would not credit his prior years of church service toward the Regional Retirement Plan. Valley
The trial court went far beyond interpreting or clarifying the decree and instead substituted a cost-sharing arrangement for the provision of the settlement agreement that makes Freeman responsible for "all" of his son's reasonable, necessary uninsured medical expenses. See Pineres v. George, 284 Ga. 483 (1) ( 668 SE2d 727) (2008) (trial court improperly modified the parties' divorce decree when it shifted final decision-making authority regarding child's health care to coparenting counselor); Perry v. Perry, 265 Ga. 186 (3) ( 454 SE2d 122) (1995) (trial court improperly modified terms of divorce judgment, which provided that father would be responsible for children's uninsured medical and dental expenses, by ruling that father was responsible for one-half of uninsured expenses). We reverse the trial court's order insofar as it states that the parties are to share the child's reasonable uninsured medical expenses.
Bryan County v. Yates Paving Grading Co., 281 Ga. 361, 363 ( 638 SE2d 302) (2006) (res judicata acts as procedural bar to claims that were raised or could have been raised in prior action).Pineres v. George, 284 Ga. 483, 483-484 ( 668 SE2d 727) (2008); Carson v. Carson, 277 Ga. 335, 337 ( 588 SE2d 735) (2003). Vereen's claim that his appeal in a separate action in a different court precluded the trial court from awarding attorney fees in this action is without merit.
.Id. at 562–63(2)(a), 660 S.E.2d 412 (punctuation omitted).Pineres v. George, 284 Ga. 483, 483–84(2), 668 S.E.2d 727 (2008). Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part and case remanded.
Id. at 562-63 (2) (a) (punctuation omitted). Pineres v. George, 284 Ga. 483, 483-84 (2) (668 SE2d 727) (2008). --------
”) (citations and punctuation omitted). 13. Pineres v. George, 284 Ga. 483(1), 668 S.E.2d 727 (2008) (Trial court erred “when it shifted final decision-making authority regarding their minor son's health care to their co-parenting counselor [.]”); McCall v. McCall, 246 Ga.App. 770, 773(2), 542 S.E.2d 168 (2000) (By granting new rights and entitlements to the noncustodial parent, “the trial court effectively granted a change in custody equivalent to ‘joint legal custody.’ ”) (footnote omitted).