From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pineda v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Aug 2, 2022
No. 01-22-00219-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2022)

Opinion

01-22-00219-CR

08-02-2022

Isaias Pineda v. The State of Texas


209th District Court of Harris County Trial court case No: 1556925

ORDER

Peter Kelly, Judge

On July 19, 2022, George J. Parnham filed a request to substitute for Nicole Wignall DeBorde, appellant's current counsel. The motion fails to comply with Rule 6.5(d). See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(d).

Rule 6.5 (d) requires counsel substituting for other counsel to include his name, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, if any, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See id. The rule also requires substituting counsel to deliver the motion to the party, either in person or by certified and first-class mail to the party's last known address. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(b), (d). The motion filed on July 19, 2022 includes all identifying information concerning the substituting attorney but does not indicate that the motion was delivered to appellant.

Accordingly, the motion is stricken without prejudice to the refiling of another motion to substitute in compliance with Rule 6.5.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pineda v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Aug 2, 2022
No. 01-22-00219-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Pineda v. State

Case Details

Full title:Isaias Pineda v. The State of Texas

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Aug 2, 2022

Citations

No. 01-22-00219-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2022)