From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pineda v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2019
Case No. 1:19-cv-00260-DAD-EPG-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 1:19-cv-00260-DAD-EPG-HC

12-03-2019

LUIS ALBERTO VALENCIA PINEDA, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.


ORDER VACATING JUNE 6, 2019 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 13) ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO OBJECTIONS (ECF No. 19) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO AMEND CAPTION AND SEND PETITIONER A COPY OF RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO OBJECTIONS

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 6, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendation recommending that Respondent's motion to dismiss be granted and the petition be dismissed as untimely. (ECF No. 13). On November 22, 2019, Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendation, arguing that he is entitled to equitable tolling. (ECF No. 18). On December 2, 2019, Respondent filed a reply to the objections. (ECF No. 19).

The statutory limitation period is subject to equitable tolling if a petitioner demonstrates "'(1) that he has been pursuing his rights diligently, and (2) that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way' and prevented timely filing." Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010) (quoting Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005)). The petitioner bears the "heavy burden" of showing that he is entitled to equitable tolling. Chaffer v. Prosper, 592 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:

1. The findings and recommendation issued on June 6, 2019 (ECF No. 13) is VACATED;

2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent shall file a response to Respondent's reply to the objections;

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to amend the caption to reflect Luis Alberto Valencia Pineda as Petitioner; and

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of Respondent's reply to the objections (ECF No. 19) to Petitioner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3 , 2019

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Pineda v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2019
Case No. 1:19-cv-00260-DAD-EPG-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Pineda v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:LUIS ALBERTO VALENCIA PINEDA, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2019

Citations

Case No. 1:19-cv-00260-DAD-EPG-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2019)