From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pine v. Multnomah County

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 2, 2005
Civil No. 05-498-AS (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-498-AS.

November 2, 2005

M. Christian Bottoms, LAW OFFICE OF M. CHRISTIAN BOTTOMS, Portland, OR, David N. Blankfeld, State of Oregon, MULTNOMAH COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Portland, OR, James G. Rice, CITY OF PORTLAND, Portland, OR, Attorney for Plaintiff.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas filed Findings and Recommendation (#21) on October 6, 2005, in the above-entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas's Findings and Recommendation (#21) dated October 5, 2005, in its entirety. Defendants Multnomah County and John Does' motion (#15) to dismiss is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pine v. Multnomah County

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 2, 2005
Civil No. 05-498-AS (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2005)
Case details for

Pine v. Multnomah County

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PINE, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, a municipal corporation; et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 2, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 05-498-AS (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2005)