From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pine v. M.E. Conran Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1944
268 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

June 12, 1944.


Defendant appeals from an order granting an injunction restraining it from prosecuting pending supplementary proceedings. Order modified on the law by striking out the figures "$250" and by inserting in place thereof the following: "$3,456.84, the full amount of the judgment, including interest and costs, and a further sum of $250, to pay to defendant all damages and costs which may be awarded to it"; and by striking out everything following the words "upon the attorneys for the defendant." As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. The injunction order granted in this action stays "proceedings upon a judgment for a sum of money" within the purview of section 886 of the Civil Practice Act, and the court was without power to stay the proceedings unless a bond was furnished, as provided in that section. Close, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, pp. 822, 909.]


Summaries of

Pine v. M.E. Conran Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1944
268 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Pine v. M.E. Conran Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN PINE, Respondent, v. M.E. CONRAN CO., INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Zapryluk v. Milau

The provision for security, however, should not have been deleted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 886; Pine v. Conran…

Shipman v. Bennett

25 as further security for the payment of the judgment, in addition to the $2,000 surety company bond…