From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 27, 2006
No. CV-91-1764-PHX-DAE (LOA) (D. Ariz. Apr. 27, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV-91-1764-PHX-DAE (LOA).

April 27, 2006


ORDER


This matter arises on the Parties' Stipulated Request for an Expedite Briefing Schedule and Request for an Expedited Decision regarding BHP's Motion to Compel Production of Experts' Work Files in the Possession of Golder Associates, Inc.

The Parties further stipulate that if the Court requires PDMI/Inspiration to produce all or part of the Glder documents requested, BHP will be entitled to re-open the Fetter, Bethke and/or Brown depositions as appropriate to address with the experts those documents, if any, ordered by the Court to be produced to BHP.

Good cause appearing and upon stipulation of the Parties,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties shall proceed under the following Expedited Briefing Schedule:

1. April 25, 2006 BHP files its Motion to Compel Production

2. May 8, 2006 PDMI/Inspiration file their Resonse to BHP's Motion

3. May 12, 2006 BHP files its Reply.


Summaries of

Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Apr 27, 2006
No. CV-91-1764-PHX-DAE (LOA) (D. Ariz. Apr. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.

Case Details

Full title:The Pinal Creek Group, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Newmont Mining Corp., et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Apr 27, 2006

Citations

No. CV-91-1764-PHX-DAE (LOA) (D. Ariz. Apr. 27, 2006)