From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pina v. U.S. Marshal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 24, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-80 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-80

03-24-2015

DEMIAN PINA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #2), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. March 24, 2015

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pina v. U.S. Marshal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 24, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-80 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Pina v. U.S. Marshal

Case Details

Full title:DEMIAN PINA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 24, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-80 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2015)