Pina v. State

Full title: Tomas F. PINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jul 1, 2016

200 So. 3d 185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 5D15–928.

07-01-2016

Tomas F. PINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert J. Pearce III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert J. Pearce III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erred by relying solely on hearsay evidence to revoke Appellant's probation. See Crume v. State, 703 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order revoking Appellant's probation and remand with instructions to reinstate his probation.

REVERSED and REMANDED with Instructions.

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.