From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 12, 1985
473 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

Nos. 84-1487 to 84-1489.

June 12, 1985.

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Mark A. Speiser, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Thomas F. Ball III, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the appellant's convictions and sentences on the authority of Horvitz v. State, 433 So.2d 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) and Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The trial court erred in failing to grant the motion to suppress. We also certify the following question posed in Tamer as one of great public importance:

Under the 1983 amendment to article 1, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and SALMON, MICHAEL H., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Pina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 12, 1985
473 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Pina v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAMON R. PINA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 12, 1985

Citations

473 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)