From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pimentel v. 2275 Holding, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1997
236 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

February 11, 1997.

"Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 1, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs an extension of time to serve a bill of particulars on each of the defendants-appellants, and order, same court and Justice, entered June 17, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs a further extension of time to serve bills of particulars, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.


The motion court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting plaintiffs final opportunities to provide the required bills of particulars ( see, e.g., Kolner, Inc. v Dziadul, 55 AD2d 716). We have considered defendants-appellants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Pimentel v. 2275 Holding, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1997
236 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Pimentel v. 2275 Holding, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL PIMENTEL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of KATTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1997

Citations

236 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
654 N.Y.S.2d 289