From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PIM v. STEINBICHLER OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES USA

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 30, 2003
468 Mich. 896 (Mich. 2003)

Opinion

Nos. 120989, 120990.

April 30, 2003.


COA: 220053, Oakland CC: 99-014105-CK

SC: 120990, COA: 222221, Oakland CC: 99-014097-CK

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 4, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The trial court's order dismissing Oakland Circuit Court No. 99-014105-CK is REVERSED. The trial court's order denying the motion to intervene and granting summary disposition to the plaintiffs in Oakland Circuit Court No. 99-014097-CK is also REVERSED. The misnomer of a person or corporation in a written instrument will not defeat a recovery thereon if the identity sufficiently appears from the name employed in the writing or is satisfactorily established by proof. St. Matthew's Evangelical Lutheran Church v. United States Fidelity Guarantee Co, 222 Mich. 256; 192 N.W. 384 (1923). Here, the fact that P.I.M. Management Company was described in the contract as "PIM, Inc." is immaterial. It does not appear that any fraudulent intent was involved or that anyone was in any way deceived. Bil-Gel Company v. Thoma, 345 Mich. 698; 77 N.W.2d 89 (1956).

The matter is REMANDED to the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

PIM v. STEINBICHLER OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES USA

Supreme Court of Michigan
Apr 30, 2003
468 Mich. 896 (Mich. 2003)
Case details for

PIM v. STEINBICHLER OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES USA

Case Details

Full title:PIM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEINBICHLER OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES USA…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Apr 30, 2003

Citations

468 Mich. 896 (Mich. 2003)
660 N.W.2d 73

Citing Cases

Duncan v. Salon

"It is an old rule, and a sensible one, that the misnomer of a person or corporation in a written instrument…

Klaasen v. Jonker

The misnomer doctrine provides that "[t]he misnomer of a person or corporation in a written instrument will…