Opinion
Record No. 2162-13-4
03-18-2014
PILOT CORPORATION AND PILOT CORPORATION AND PILOT TRAVEL CENTER v. RENICIA GREGORY
(Heather K. Bardot; Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Brenda C. Moses; The Moses Law Firm, PC, on brief), for appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Present: Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Senior Judge Bumgardner
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
PER CURIAM
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Heather K. Bardot; Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, P.C., on brief), for appellants.
(Brenda C. Moses; The Moses Law Firm, PC, on brief), for appellee.
Pilot Corporation and Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Center ("employer") appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission ("the commission") finding that Renicia Gregory ("claimant") proved she sustained a compensable injury to her right shoulder and mid-back in an accident on August 30, 2012. Employer also maintains the commission erred in finding claimant proved her disability was related to a compensable injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Gregory v. Pilot Corp., JCN VA02000012201 (Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Employer acknowledges it originally appealed the commission's finding that claimant proved she sustained a compensable injury to her lower back as a result of the August 30, 2012 accident, but has now abandoned that argument.
--------
Affirmed.