From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pillsbury v. Charles Nelson Company

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 8, 1932
56 F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1932)

Opinion

Nos. 6543, 6544.

February 8, 1932.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge.

George J. Hatfield, U.S. Atty., and Leo C. Dunnell, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

John H. Black and James M. Wallace, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and McCORMICK, District Judge.


On authority of Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Company (C.C.A.) 56 F.2d 74, and Pillsbury v. Pacific Steamship Company (C.C.A.) 56 F.2d 79, both filed February 1, 1932, the judgments, 48 F.2d 883, are affirmed.


Summaries of

Pillsbury v. Charles Nelson Company

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 8, 1932
56 F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1932)
Case details for

Pillsbury v. Charles Nelson Company

Case Details

Full title:Warren H. PILLSBURY, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Employees…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 1932

Citations

56 F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1932)

Citing Cases

California Ship Service Co. v. Pillsbury

On a literal reading subdivision (b) might be thought to apply, but the rule in this circuit is that (b) is…