From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. McNeill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 24, 1939
95 P.2d 235 (Okla. 1939)

Opinion

No. 29014.

October 24, 1939.

(Syllabus.)

Workmen's Compensation — Review of Awards by Court — Disposition of Cause Upon Confession of Error by Claimant.

In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the claimant, respondent, files a confession of error and the record and the authorities reasonably support said confession of error, this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial Commission with instructions to vacate the award in accordance with said confession of error.

Original proceeding in the Supreme Court by the Pillsbury Flour Mills Company et al. to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of George Riley McNeill. Award vacated, with directions.

Crouch, Rhodes Crowe, of Oklahoma City, for petitioners.

L.E. Roseboom, of Enid, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondent.


By this proceeding the petitioner Pillsbury Flour Mills Company, employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, insurance carrier, seek to review an award of the State Industrial Commission entered November 18, 1938, in favor of George Riley McNeill, respondent, who was claimant in the State Industrial Commission, which award found that respondent was totally temporarily disabled by reason of an accidental injury and ordered payment accordingly.

One of the specifications of error in the petition for review is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the award. On March 28, 1939, respondent filed a confession of error in which it is admitted that the evidence in the record now before us might be insufficient. He suggests that the cause be remanded to the State Industrial Commission for further proceedings, but such proceeding is not authorized for such purpose.

Under the authority of Harbour-Longmire Co. v. Owrey, 167 Okla. 417, 30 P.2d 163, upon the filing of such confession of error, the award may be vacated.

The award is vacated.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. DAVISON and DANNER, JJ., absent.


Summaries of

Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. McNeill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 24, 1939
95 P.2d 235 (Okla. 1939)
Case details for

Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. McNeill

Case Details

Full title:PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. et al. v. McNEILL et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 24, 1939

Citations

95 P.2d 235 (Okla. 1939)
185 Okla. 574

Citing Cases

Special Indemnity Fund v. Sadler

In such case we have held that this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial…

Orr v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Such a matter should not be left to the conjecture and speculation of a jury when it is common knowledge that…