From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pilgrim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 6, 1987
499 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-320.

November 20, 1986. Rehearing Denied January 6, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County; E.L. Eastmoore, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and W. Brian Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence. It is the second appeal because we earlier quashed an improper sentence and remanded for resentencing. Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Because the trial court has once again failed to follow the dictates of the sentencing guidelines rules and statutes we must quash the sentence. Upon remand the trial judge is directed to impose a sentence of no less than five and one-half years and no greater than seven years imprisonment, probation or community control.

SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pilgrim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 6, 1987
499 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Pilgrim v. State

Case Details

Full title:BERTLEY S. PILGRIM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 6, 1987

Citations

499 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)