From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pigg v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Aug 10, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-cv-1466 (W.D. La. Aug. 10, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-cv-1466

08-10-2020

RANDY PIGG #V-46860 v. THOMAS F HARRIS


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, including the written objections filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;

It is ordered that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The Court acknowledges that, after the Report and Recommendation was issued, Plaintiff sought to amend his complaint to include an additional defendant in order to establish complete diversity and made references in his various filings to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Record Document 39. The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Hornsby's ruling that the addition of another defendant and "Plaintiff's bare references to Section 1983" do not cure the jurisdictional deficiencies noted in the Report and Recommendation. Record Document 40.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 10th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

ELIZABETH E. FOOTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pigg v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Aug 10, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-cv-1466 (W.D. La. Aug. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Pigg v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:RANDY PIGG #V-46860 v. THOMAS F HARRIS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Aug 10, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-cv-1466 (W.D. La. Aug. 10, 2020)