From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pigford v. Veneman

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Sep 12, 2002
221 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2002)

Opinion

Civil Action Nos. 97-1978 (PLF, 98-1693 (PLF

September 12, 2002


ORDER


The Court has before it an Emergency Motion to Order the Government to Reopen Public Facility, filed by pro se movant Thomas Burrell. Although the motion contains the conclusory assertion that "[t]he court has jurisdiction in this matter," the subject of the motion — the allegedly unconstitutional closing of a public facility by the United States Department of Agriculture — is altogether unrelated to the complaint in this case, the settlement that closed this case or the continuing implementation of that settlement. Furthermore, to the extent that any federal court has jurisdiction to act on this motion, it is the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Arkansas, in which, movant has informed the Court, he also has filed this motion. Based on the absence of any connection between the instant motion and the case of Pigford v. Veneman, it is hereby

ORDERED that the emergency motion to order the government to reopen public facility is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pigford v. Veneman

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Sep 12, 2002
221 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2002)
Case details for

Pigford v. Veneman

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY PIGFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANN VENEMAN, Secretary, United…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Sep 12, 2002

Citations

221 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2002)