From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78195

Filed: April 17, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HONORABLE LUCY D. RAUCH

Lisa M. Stroup, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stephanie Morrell, Assistant Attorney General, Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER


Michael Pierson appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, legal file and transcript. We find that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a brief memorandum for their information only stating the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pierson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Pierson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL D. PIERSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 17, 2001

Citations

43 S.W.3d 455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)