From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 17, 2002
85 S.W.3d 701 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 80148

September 17, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County; Lucy D. Rauch, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joel A. Block, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Mary K. Hoff and George W. Draper III, JJ.


ORDER


Albert L. Pierson, III, Movant, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred because his trial counsel (1) failed to investigate and introduce into evidence a family videotape, (2) failed to locate and call witnesses, and (3) failed to timely endorse a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pierson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 17, 2002
85 S.W.3d 701 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Pierson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT L. PIERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 17, 2002

Citations

85 S.W.3d 701 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Pierson v. Dormire

Petitioner filed a timely motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15,…

Pierson v. Dormire

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief on September 17, 2002. Pierson v.…