From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. Pierson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Mar 9, 1911
15 Cal.App. 567 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)

Opinion

Civ. No. 960.

March 9, 1911.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. William D. Dehy, Judge presiding.

Judgment reversed upon stipulation of the parties for reversible error appearing on the face of the record.

Winslow P. Hyatt, for Appellant.

Morton, Riddle Hollzer, and S. A.D. Gray, for Respondent.


Action for divorce. The parties hereto, through their respective attorneys, having filed a stipulation that reversible error exists in the record, and upon examination of such record it appearing that findings of fact were not waived, and that no findings sufficient to support a judgment were by the court signed or filed in the cause, it is, therefore, ordered that the judgment in the above-entitled cause be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Pierson v. Pierson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Mar 9, 1911
15 Cal.App. 567 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)
Case details for

Pierson v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:CARRIE D. PIERSON, Appellant, v. CHARLES J. PIERSON, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Mar 9, 1911

Citations

15 Cal.App. 567 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)
115 P. 461