From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierson v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2021
Case No. LACV 19-183-JWH (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. LACV 19-183-JWH (LAL)

03-29-2021

ANDRE R. PIERSON, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order on the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 29, 2021

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOHN W. HOLCOMB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pierson v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2021
Case No. LACV 19-183-JWH (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Pierson v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE R. PIERSON, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2021

Citations

Case No. LACV 19-183-JWH (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2021)