Opinion
No. 2021-CC-01105
08-11-2021
Writ application granted. See per curiam.
PER CURIAM
Our jurisprudence has long recognized that "the right of a litigant to jury trial is fundamental in character and the courts will indulge every presumption against a waiver, loss or forfeiture thereof." Champagne v. American Southern Ins. Co. , 295 So. 2d 437, 439 (La. 1974).
In this case, relators filed their jury deposit within ten days of the date another party failed to make a timely deposit. Relator's jury deposit is therefore timely. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 1734.1 ; Willeby v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc ., 04-2421 (La. App. 1 Cir. 6/10/05), 917 So. 2d 21. We find Plauche v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co ., 2011-1288 (La. App. 3 Cir. 5/16/12), 89 So. 3d 521, writ denied , 2012-1365 (La. 10/8/12), 98 So. 3d 854, distinguishable from the matter sub judice .
Accordingly, the writ is granted. The judgment of the district court is reversed, and the jury trial is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.