From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Washtenaw Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 13, 2024
No. 22-12786 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2024)

Opinion

22-12786

08-13-2024

ROGER PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. WASHTENAW CO. JAIL, et al., Defendants.


Curtis Ivy United States Magistrate Judge

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JULY 15, 2024 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 87)

F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy's July 15, 2024 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 87). Magistrate Judge Ivy recommends dismissing Defendant Patrice Morgan based on the lack of service, despite the court's efforts to serve Morgan and locate an address for personal service. Id. Plaintiff was warned on multiple occasions that Morgan would be dismissed if service could not be effectuated. Id. The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. "[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter." Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 87) and DISMISSES Defendant Patrice Morgan from this lawsuit without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Washtenaw Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 13, 2024
No. 22-12786 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Pierce v. Washtenaw Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:ROGER PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. WASHTENAW CO. JAIL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 13, 2024

Citations

No. 22-12786 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2024)