From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 15, 1991
583 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-1018.

July 17, 1991. On Motion for Rehearing August 15, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; Robert B. McGregor, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We grant appellant's motion for rehearing for the purpose of certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pierce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 15, 1991
583 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Pierce v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL S. PIERCE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 15, 1991

Citations

583 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Pierce v. State of Florida

PER CURIAM. We have for review Pierce v. State, 583 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth…