From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Jun 12, 2018
548 S.W.3d 923 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106065

06-12-2018

Shawn PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Pierce appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pierce v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Jun 12, 2018
548 S.W.3d 923 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Pierce v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shawn PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

Citations

548 S.W.3d 923 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Bosworth v. State

As was the case with the habeas petitioner in Windeknecht, the Rule 24.035 movants in Watson and…