From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 24, 2006
919 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D05-3147.

December 12, 2005. Rehearing Denied January 24, 2006.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus — Original Jurisdiction.

Eddie Willie Pierce, petitioner, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Edward C. Hill, Jr., Special Counsel, and John Andrew Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.


As it pertains to petitioner's motion and amended motion for postconviction relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot in light of the trial court's recent order denying those motions. The remaining relief sought by the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot in light of the trial court's order directing the filing of written responses to the pending motion for in-camera inspection. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pierce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 24, 2006
919 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Pierce v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eddie Willie PIERCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 24, 2006

Citations

919 So. 2d 511 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)