From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Stainer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 26, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1635 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1635 KJN P

08-26-2011

DALE A. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL STAINER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Respondent has requested a thirty day extension of time to file an answer or otherwise responsive pleading. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's August 22, 2011 request for an extension of time (dkt. no. 11) is granted; and

2. Respondent shall file a responsive pleading on or before September 22, 2011. Petitioner's traverse, if any, shall be filed thirty days thereafter.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Pierce v. Stainer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 26, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1635 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Pierce v. Stainer

Case Details

Full title:DALE A. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL STAINER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1635 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)