From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Pierce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 2002
291 A.D.2d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

207N

February 7, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered October 9, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, determined that all issues of fault and equitable distribution were deemed resolved by a prior Family Court order entered on or about May 16, 2001, to the effect that there was no valid marriage between the parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

MICHELE TORTORELLI, for plaintiff-appellant.

ROLAND ACEVEDO, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


Plaintiff, who sought, inter alia, visitation with, and/or custody of, his and defendant's yet unborn child in a matrimonial action brought in Supreme Court, New York County, was barred under the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata from relitigating the issue of whether he and defendant had been validly married, the issue having been previously determined by Family Court, Bronx County in a separate proceeding brought by plaintiff against defendant in which he sought,inter alia, to compel defendant to undergo a mental health examination and evaluation (see, Casson v. Casson, 107 A.D.2d 342, appeal dismissed 65 N.Y.2d 637; and see, Buechel v. Bain, 97 N.Y.2d 295; 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3814). We note that in Family Court, plaintiff conceded there was no valid civil certificate of marriage.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Pierce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 2002
291 A.D.2d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Pierce v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN PIERCE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ELIZABETH EISINGER MELTZER PIERCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 876

Citing Cases

In re Lee

Respondent's opposition focuses on three essential points: one, that the Family Court finding was incorrect,…

340 West LLC v. Spring Street Garage Condominium

Facts that formed the basis of a determination, that were conceded or admitted by the party against whom…