From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Madejski

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 3, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

Motion No. CA 21-00109

06-03-2022

ESTATE OF MARK D. PIERCE, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH DEBORAH PIERCE, AS EXECUTRIX, AND DEBORAH PIERCE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THOMAS MADEJSKI, M.D., JOSEPH MISITI, M.D., DALE W. SPONAUGLE, M.D., RADIOLOGY SOLUTIONS ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

Defendants-appellants Thomas Madejski, MD, Dale W. Sponaugle, MD, and Radiology Solutions Associates, PLLC, having moved to withdraw with prejudice the appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County, entered December 8, 2020,

Now upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, with costs payable to plaintiffs-respondents.


Summaries of

Pierce v. Madejski

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 3, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Pierce v. Madejski

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF MARK D. PIERCE, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH DEBORAH PIERCE, AS…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66933