From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Haygood

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 6, 1957
99 S.E.2d 906 (Ga. 1957)

Opinion

19755, 19773, 19776.

ARGUED JULY 8, 1957.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1957.

Appellate procedure. Before Judge Cobb. Clarke Superior Court. March 23, 1957.

C. O. Baker, Gardner Gayner, Jay D. Gardner, for plaintiff in error (case No. 19755).

Claud R. Caldwell, O. J. Tolnas, P. J. Smith, contra.

Claud R. Caldwell, O. J. Tolnas, for plaintiff in error (case No. 19773).

P. J. Smith, C. O. Baker, contra.

P. J. Smith, for plaintiff in error (case No. 19776).

O. J. Tolnas, C. O. Baker, contra.


1. Where the judge fails to certify that the "bill of exceptions is true," this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the exceptions. Code § 6-806, as amended, Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 732; Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 ( 131 S.E. 282); Blackley v. Bell, 187 Ga. 702 ( 1 S.E.2d 676); Edge v. State, 199 Ga. 431 ( 34 S.E.2d 498); Beasley v. Georgia Power Co., 207 Ga. 188 ( 60 S.E.2d 363).

2. There can be no second certificate to a bill of exceptions. Scott v. Central Railroad, 77 Ga. 450; Cordray v. Savannah Union Station Co., 134 Ga. 865 ( 68 S.E. 697); Langston v. Langston, 141 Ga. 675, 676 (4) ( 82 S.E. 36); Grant v. Southern Bell Telephone c. Co., 145 Ga. 298 ( 89 S.E. 364); Cartledge v. Ashford, 148 Ga. 589 ( 97 S.E. 521); Kniepkamp v. Richards, 192 Ga. 509, 515 ( 16 S.E.2d 24).

3. Code § 6-810, providing for the certification of material evidence omitted from the transcript of the record, has no application to the facts of the present case, and this court is without jurisdiction to consider the main bill of exceptions. This ruling terminates the case, and the cross-bills of exceptions are therefore dismissed.

Writs of error dismissed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JULY 8, 1957 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1957.


On April 29, 1957, the trial judge signed a certificate to the bill of exceptions, to the effect that "the same is considered as averments of plaintiff's contentions," but nowhere in the certificate did the judge certify that "the foregoing bill of exceptions is true." The bill of exceptions was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on May 22, 1957. On May 24, 1957, one of the defendants in error filed a motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions because it "has not been certified as true by the trial judge." On June 1, 1957, the trial judge signed a certificate stating "that the word true was inadvertently omitted by me in making up my certificate."


Summaries of

Pierce v. Haygood

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 6, 1957
99 S.E.2d 906 (Ga. 1957)
Case details for

Pierce v. Haygood

Case Details

Full title:PIERCE v. HAYGOOD et al. WILLINGHAM FINANCE COMPANY, INC., v. PIERCE et…

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 6, 1957

Citations

99 S.E.2d 906 (Ga. 1957)
99 S.E.2d 906

Citing Cases

Walker v. State

1. Where, in a bill of exceptions, "assigning error on all the rulings complained of, as being contrary to…

Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Company, Inc.

There being no certification by the trial judge that the bill of exceptions is true, this court is without…