Opinion
362243
09-07-2022
Ashley Ann Pierce v. Joshua Daniel DeGlopper
LC No. 2014-052793-DC.
Christopher M. Murray, Presiding Judge, David H. Sawyer, Jane E. Markey, Judges.
ORDER
The motion for reconsideration is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion for reconsideration is GRANTED to the extent that the appeal is reopened only as to the June 28, 2022 "Order Regarding Defendant's Motion to Suspend or Supervise Plaintiff's Parenting Time, Change the Parenting Time Schedule, and Change of Custody due to a Change of Circumstances." Moreover, this appeal is limited to the portion of the order regarding custody. MCR 7.203(A); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii). The motion for reconsideration is DENIED regarding the reopening of the appeal as to the June 28, 2022 "Order Regarding Defendant's Friend of the Court Parenting Time Complaints." That June 28, 2022 order is an order of civil contempt which is not appealable by right. See In re Moroun, 295 Mich.App. 312, 329; 814 N.W.2d 319 (2012). Dismissal of the appeal from the June 28, 2022 contempt order is without prejudice to whatever other relief may be available consistent with the court rules.
Appellant's motion for immediate consideration is DENIED.
Appellant's "motion to vacate and request for peremptory reversal of custody order" is DENIED without prejudice to appellant filing a motion for peremptory reversal as to only the June 28, 2022 "Order Regarding Defendant's Motion to Suspend or Supervise Plaintiff's Parenting Time, Change the Parenting Time Schedule, and Change of Custody due to a Change of Circumstances."