From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. City of Brooklyn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13 CV 2001 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:13 CV 2001

01-24-2014

MICHAEL W. PIERCE, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF BROOKLYN, OHIO, POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Third-Party Defendant.


JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Docket #20) filed by Third-Party Defendant, United States of America.

The currency that Petitioners seek to recover in this case is the subject of a Federal civil forfeiture action, United States v. $76,857.00 In U.S. Currency, Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:13 CV 1523, pending before this Court. The civil forfeiture action is stayed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g), pending resolution of the related Federal criminal case, United States v. Bridgette Day, Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:13 CR 427, in which Petitioners have been indicted.

The indictment in Case No. 1:13 CR 427 contains a criminal forfeiture count.

Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the Federal civil forfeiture action will provide an inadequate legal remedy and it is of no consequence that the civil forfeiture action was filed after Petitioners' initial Complaint in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. $8,050.00 in U.S. Currency v. United States, 307 F. Supp. 2d 922, 927 (N.D. Ohio 2004). Petitioners do not dispute that civil forfeiture proceedings have been instituted, nor do they argue that they did not receive notice of said proceedings. Petitioners filed Verified Claims for the currency and Answers to the Complaint in the civil forfeiture action. (In re: $76,857 in U.S. Currency, Docket #s 5, 6, 10, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 20.) Accordingly, this case must be dismissed.

Conclusion

The Motion to Dismiss filed by the United States (Docket #20) is hereby GRANTED, This case is hereby TERMINATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

DONALD C. NUGENT

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pierce v. City of Brooklyn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 24, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13 CV 2001 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Pierce v. City of Brooklyn

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL W. PIERCE, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF BROOKLYN, OHIO, POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1:13 CV 2001 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2014)