From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pierce v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 31, 2019
CASE NO. 1:18CV543 (N.D. Ohio May. 31, 2019)

Summary

requiring plaintiff provide evidence connecting his obesity to his functional limitations

Summary of this case from Flack v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:18CV543

05-31-2019

DENINE PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

An Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") denied Plaintiff Denine Pierce's application for supplemental security income ("SSI") after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ's decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner's decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). On May 2, 2019, the magistrate judge submitted a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service. On May 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Response to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), stating that Plaintiff will not be filing objections. Furthermore, the Commissioner has not filed any objections, evidencing satisfaction with the magistrate judge's recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v . Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd , 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v . Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v . Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED. May 31, 2019
Date

/s/ Benita Y . Pearson

Benita Y. Pearson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pierce v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 31, 2019
CASE NO. 1:18CV543 (N.D. Ohio May. 31, 2019)

requiring plaintiff provide evidence connecting his obesity to his functional limitations

Summary of this case from Flack v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Pierce v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:DENINE PIERCE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 31, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 1:18CV543 (N.D. Ohio May. 31, 2019)

Citing Cases

Flack v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

To show that her obesity constitutes a severe condition, Plaintiff must provide medical records linking her…