Pierce v. Adams

Full title: PATRICK ANDREW PIERCE, Petitioner, v. DARREL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

No. CIV S-06-1622 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1622 FCD GGH P.

September 17, 2007

ORDER

GREGORY HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, has filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to the court's order, filed on August 29, 2007, petitioner has informed the court that he intends to rely on his previously filed (on February 6, 2007) memorandum of points and authorities in support of the first amended petition.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Respondent file, within 30 days of the filing date of this order, an answer or dispositive motion;

2. Thereafter, petitioner is to file a traverse or opposition, as appropriate, within 30 days of service of the respondent's responsive pleading; and

3. If respondent filed a motion, respondent will have 30 days after service of an opposition to file a reply.