From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT

09-09-2021

SUZANNE NA PIER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. RIDGECREST CINEMA, LTD Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 9)

Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE NA PIER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. RIDGECREST CINEMA, LTD…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)