From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pier v. Ridgecrest Capital, L.P.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:21-cv-00891-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00891-AWI-JLT

07-12-2021

SUZANNE NA PIER, Plaintiff, v. RIDGECREST CAPITAL, L.P., Defendant.


ORDER AFTER NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT (DOC. 7)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The plaintiff reports she has settled the matter and indicate she will seek dismissal of the action soon. (Doc. 7 at 2) Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1. The stipulation to dismiss the action SHALL be filed no later than September 3, 2021 ;
2. All pending dates, conferences and hearings are VACATED.

The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the Court imposing sanctions, including the dismissal of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pier v. Ridgecrest Capital, L.P.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:21-cv-00891-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Pier v. Ridgecrest Capital, L.P.

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE NA PIER, Plaintiff, v. RIDGECREST CAPITAL, L.P., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 12, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00891-AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)