From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piedmont Fire Insurance v. Stinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1938
197 S.E. 751 (N.C. 1938)

Opinion

(Filed 22 June, 1938.)

Appeal and Error § 38 —

When the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by plaintiff from S. J. Ervin, Jr., Special Judge, at Extra March Civil Term, 1938, of MECKLENBURG. Affirmed.

Guthrie, Pierce Blakeney for plaintiff.

J. Clyde Stancill and Henry E. Fisher for defendant.


The question involved: In determining the amount of the 1937 ad valorem taxes to be assessed and imposed by Mecklenburg County upon the taxable "solvent credits" of the Piedmont Fire Insurance Company, is the Piedmont Fire Insurance Company entitled to deduct from its otherwise taxable "solvent credits" the amount of its "unearned premiums" as of the tax return date?

The court being evenly divided in opinion, Seawell, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840; McMahan v. Basinger, 211 N.C. 747; Braswell v. Town of Wilson, 212 N.C. 833.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Piedmont Fire Insurance v. Stinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1938
197 S.E. 751 (N.C. 1938)
Case details for

Piedmont Fire Insurance v. Stinson

Case Details

Full title:PIEDMONT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. J. W. STINSON…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1938

Citations

197 S.E. 751 (N.C. 1938)
197 S.E. 751

Citing Cases

Brantley v. R. R

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Barnhill, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is…