From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piechocki v. Smith

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Mar 4, 2020
293 So. 3d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-1220

03-04-2020

Austin James PIECHOCKI, Appellant, v. David Gerard SMITH, and John M. Piechocki, Appellees.

Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus and Katherine Gannon of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue, McLain & Mangan, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Maegen Peek Luka of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Maegen Peek Luka of Newsome Melton, Orlando; and John D. Andreopoulos of Andreopoulos Law Firm, Holiday; for Appellee David Gerard Smith. No appearance for Appellee John M. Piechocki.


Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus and Katherine Gannon of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue, McLain & Mangan, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Maegen Peek Luka of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Maegen Peek Luka of Newsome Melton, Orlando; and John D. Andreopoulos of Andreopoulos Law Firm, Holiday; for Appellee David Gerard Smith.

No appearance for Appellee John M. Piechocki.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LUCAS, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Piechocki v. Smith

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Mar 4, 2020
293 So. 3d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Piechocki v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:AUSTIN JAMES PIECHOCKI, Appellant, v. DAVID GERARD SMITH, and JOHN M…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 4, 2020

Citations

293 So. 3d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)