From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pidgeon v. E. Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 11, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-342-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 11, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-342-JJB-RLB

09-11-2017

ALICE M. PIDGEON v. EAST BATON ROUGE SHERIFF'S OFFICE


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated August 21, 2017 (R. Doc. 10) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (R. Doc. 2) is GRANTED, and the action is REMANDED to the 19th Judicial District Court, East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. Further, the parties shall bear their own costs incurred as a result of the instant removal.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 11, 2017.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JAMES J. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Pidgeon v. E. Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 11, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-342-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Pidgeon v. E. Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office

Case Details

Full title:ALICE M. PIDGEON v. EAST BATON ROUGE SHERIFF'S OFFICE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 11, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-342-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 11, 2017)

Citing Cases

Garrett v. S. Newspapers, Inc.

Moreover, other courts have similarly held that an EEOC charge does not create a Title VII claim when…